Re: S390[x] configuration update

Andreas Schwab
2002-04-28T00:13:39Z

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:

|> On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 12:41:03AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
|> > This updates the S390/S390x configuration to follow the latest wisdom.
|> >
|> > 2002-04-28 Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
|> >
|> > * config/s390/s390.mh (NATDEPFILES): Remove slib.o and
|> > core-regset.o, add linux-proc.o and gcore.o.
|>
|> Er.... what? Why remove solib.o and core-regset.o?

solib.o is in TDEPFILES, the same as all other linux targets. But
removing core-regset.o was wrong. Misunderstanding from my side, sorry.

|> Also, I bet you didn't build test this.

Of course, I did. But I forgot to test corefile functionality.

Btw, config/i386/linux.mh NATDEPFILES lists linux-proc.o twice.

2002-04-28 Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>

* config/s390/s390.mh (NATDEPFILES): Remove slib.o, add
linux-proc.o and gcore.o.

--- gdb/config/s390/s390.mh 2002/04/27 18:51:58 1.1
+++ gdb/config/s390/s390.mh 2002/04/27 23:42:01
@@ -4,9 +4,9 @@ XM_FILE= xm-linux.h
XM_CLIBS=

NAT_FILE= nm-linux.h
-NATDEPFILES= infptrace.o solib.o inftarg.o fork-child.o corelow.o s390-nat.o core-aout.o core-regset.o
-# post 5.0 natdepfiles.
-NATDEPFILES+= thread-db.o lin-lwp.o proc-service.o
+NATDEPFILES= infptrace.o inftarg.o fork-child.o corelow.o s390-nat.o \
+ core-aout.o core-regset.o linux-proc.o gcore.o thread-db.o lin-lwp.o \
+ proc-service.o
LOADLIBES = -ldl -rdynamic

Andreas.

--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 NÃ¼rnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."