From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11908 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2002 23:23:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11899 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2002 23:23:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Apr 2002 23:23:56 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 171bY0-0001dk-00; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 19:24:08 -0400 Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 16:23:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andreas Schwab Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: S390[x] configuration update Message-ID: <20020427192408.A6259@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andreas Schwab , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01105.txt.bz2 On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 12:41:03AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > This updates the S390/S390x configuration to follow the latest wisdom. > > 2002-04-28 Andreas Schwab > > * config/s390/s390.mh (NATDEPFILES): Remove slib.o and > core-regset.o, add linux-proc.o and gcore.o. Er.... what? Why remove solib.o and core-regset.o? Also, I bet you didn't build test this. If you don't add linux-proc.o then it won't link properly. I forgot to submit the patch :( -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer