From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10263 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2002 18:52:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10255 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2002 18:52:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2002 18:52:10 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 170oLr-00045y-00 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:52:19 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:52:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] printf (stderr,... ->fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stderr,... in hpread.c Message-ID: <20020425145219.A15642@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <4.2.0.58.20020424151049.01eb0900@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <20020424102516.C6310@nevyn.them.org> <3CC6FE80.D2EC8A7E@redhat.com> <20020424152929.A20589@nevyn.them.org> <4.2.0.58.20020425183221.020e44a8@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <3CC839DF.4050807@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CC839DF.4050807@cygnus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01036.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 01:16:15PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >(Pierre, yes, ok with a tweak). > > > >Sorry, but I din't understand which version of the > >modification I should use here... > > Either is acceptable and either works. (Personally, it really doesn't > worry me :-) I suspect danielJ slightly prefers the ISO C form, so > perhaps go with that. Nod. I find that the \-newline form is uglier w.r.t. indentation, so if no one else cares... -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer