From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19753 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2002 16:58:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19725 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2002 16:58:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO igw3.watson.ibm.com) (198.81.209.18) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2002 16:58:38 -0000 Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com [9.2.112.57]) by igw3.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g3OGwMQ11974; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:58:22 -0400 Received: from makai.watson.ibm.com (makai.watson.ibm.com [9.2.216.144]) by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g3OGwMd15520; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:58:22 -0400 Received: from watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makai.watson.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.3/01-10-2000) with ESMTP id MAA24662; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:58:22 -0400 Message-Id: <200204241658.MAA24662@makai.watson.ibm.com> To: Andrew Cagney cc: Stan Shebs , Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PowerPC64 skip_prologue patch In-Reply-To: Message from Andrew Cagney of "Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:49:52 EDT." <3CC6E230.6070605@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:58:00 -0000 From: David Edelsohn X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00951.txt.bz2 >>>>> Andrew Cagney writes: Andrew> The last time IBM contributed stuff to GDB was the s390. For that, Andrew> individual electronic transfer letters were required. Andrew> Sounds like things have changed since then? The s390 and ppc64 toolchain contributions were approved by IBM a long time ago. It would help if you directly, privately contacted IBM colleagues to inquire about the facts instead of sending obtuse comments about "streams of patches" and making uninformed decisions. David