From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2868 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2002 14:22:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2810 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2002 14:22:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2002 14:22:54 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 170Nfg-0001lQ-00 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:23:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:22:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Correct machine name in config/m68k/tm-nbsd.h Message-ID: <20020424102300.B6310@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <4.2.0.58.20020424143300.01eb06f0@ics.u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20020424143300.01eb06f0@ics.u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00937.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 02:37:33PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote: > > This seems to be a pretty obviopus fix, > that I came across by doing > a 'grep -n -i I386 */*/*' > in gdb source dir. > > I still have a question: > should I update the copyright line for such an obvious fix? > (I would vote no....) I'm pretty sure that the correct answer is yes. You're modifying the file, regardless of obviousness. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer