From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1420 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2002 01:02:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1412 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2002 01:02:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pizda.ninka.net) (216.101.162.242) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2002 01:02:19 -0000 Received: from localhost (IDENT:davem@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA03382; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:52:38 -0700 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:02:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20020424.175238.00378500.davem@redhat.com> To: msnyder@redhat.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Improve Sparc epilogue analysis From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <3CC74F72.6B0F8C8B@redhat.com> References: <3CC73C70.A4BBA9D7@redhat.com> <20020424.170539.73357679.davem@redhat.com> <3CC74F72.6B0F8C8B@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00994.txt.bz2 From: Michael Snyder Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:36:02 -0700 "David S. Miller" wrote: > I'd like to ask that you re-review this change, given this, please. The part that's mentioned in the changelog entry is OK, except you can remove sparc_skip_prologue_frameless_p (and say so in the changelog) rather than rewrite it. Wait a second, how can I remove sparc_skip_prologue_frameless_p when it isn't even there anymore? :-) What exists is "sparc_prologue_frameless_p" which is a boolean. That is what replaces the functionality for what I removed (sparc_skip_prologue_frameless_p, SKIP_PROLOGUE_FRAMELESS_P, et al.). I think you're still a little confused on the current state of the tree.