From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14600 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2002 16:53:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14584 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2002 16:53:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pizda.ninka.net) (216.101.162.242) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2002 16:53:28 -0000 Received: from localhost (IDENT:davem@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA31383; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:44:02 -0700 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:53:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20020424.094402.03622681.davem@redhat.com> To: kevinb@redhat.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Locate sparc64 arguments correctly From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <1020424164233.ZM14272@localhost.localdomain> References: <1020423230940.ZM10851@localhost.localdomain> <20020424.082353.15613374.davem@redhat.com> <1020424164233.ZM14272@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00950.txt.bz2 From: Kevin Buettner Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:42:33 -0700 Hmm... I'm not sure this will work. FWIW, when I looked at this problem a few weeks back, I concluded that LOC_REF_ARG shouldn't really be used when the debug info contains information about which basereg to use. I came up with this patch instead. My testing was using dwarf2 debug info though. I haven't taken a look yet to see if it'll work with stabs. I think my fix would work, however I like your patch a whole lot better. My testing would be with dwarf2 information as well, so I wouldn't be able to provide better regression coverage in testing out your patch.