From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: kevinb@redhat.com
Cc: msnyder@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Kill SOFUN_ADDRESS_MAYBE_MISSING
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 23:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020423.230201.18283782.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1020423191000.ZM9800@localhost.localdomain>
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:10:00 -0700
I'm beginning to remember more about this now. Contrary to my previous
statements in this thread, I don't think we really lose the ability to
have symbols at address 0. We can still have them, but it's more work
to figure out that they're at zero because the minimal symbols will be
consulted to make the determination.
Ok.
If this were not the case, we could conditionalize the code with
a gdbarch boolean value that would make the code work properly in
the presence of symbols at address zero.
This all depends upon the final analysis of whether my suggested
change does, or does not actually take away the capability to have
symbols at address zero.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-24 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020422.040949.16307644.davem@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <1020422152449.ZM1373@localhost.localdomain>
2002-04-23 3:10 ` [RFA] Kill SOFUN_ADDRESS_MAYBE_MISSING (was Re: multi-arch TODO) David S. Miller
2002-04-23 6:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-23 7:01 ` [RFA] Kill SOFUN_ADDRESS_MAYBE_MISSING David S. Miller
2002-04-23 9:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-23 9:43 ` [RFA] Kill SOFUN_ADDRESS_MAYBE_MISSING (was Re: multi-arch TODO) Kevin Buettner
2002-04-23 10:58 ` Michael Snyder
2002-04-23 12:10 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-04-23 23:11 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-04-23 12:05 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-04-23 23:13 ` [RFA] Kill SOFUN_ADDRESS_MAYBE_MISSING David S. Miller
2002-04-24 1:03 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-24 17:40 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-04-24 17:53 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-24 1:13 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-24 8:35 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-24 17:48 ` Elena Zannoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020423.230201.18283782.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox