From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2481 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2002 10:55:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2425 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2002 10:55:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pizda.ninka.net) (216.101.162.242) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2002 10:55:43 -0000 Received: from localhost (IDENT:davem@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA16763; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 03:46:26 -0700 Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 03:55:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20020423.034626.17274699.davem@redhat.com> To: brobecker@ACT-Europe.FR Cc: thorpej@wasabisystems.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix recent compilation errors in alpha-nat.c on alpha-osf From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20020423121442.A15898@act-europe.fr> References: <20020422154234.F21070@act-europe.fr> <20020422085618.F27275@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <20020423121442.A15898@act-europe.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00840.txt.bz2 From: Joel Brobecker Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:14:42 +0200 Thanks for the help. I relaunched the testsuite, and here are the results on our Tru64 5.1A machine. They should be identical to yesterday's results: # of unexpected failures 791 This reminds me of an issue Richard Henderson mentioned to me. At least at one point in time gdb got really confused when gcc used float regs for integer values. This happens quite often on Alpha, and can happen on other systems too (Sparc when usage of VIS instructions is enabled). Does GDB still have a problem with this situation?