From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12362 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2002 10:21:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12078 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2002 10:21:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dublin.ACT-Europe.FR) (212.157.227.154) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2002 10:21:28 -0000 Received: from berlin.ACT-Europe.FR (berlin.int.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.169]) by dublin.ACT-Europe.FR (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F5B229E38; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:21:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by berlin.ACT-Europe.FR (Postfix, from userid 507) id B4ACC95B; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:21:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 03:21:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Elena Zannoni Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Uninitialized section index internal error on Tru64 5.1 Message-ID: <20020422122126.C21070@act-europe.fr> References: <20020412121941.E16134@act-europe.fr> <15546.1263.304306.933281@localhost.redhat.com> <20020416193952.A1404@act-europe.fr> <15552.17027.348236.908245@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <15552.17027.348236.908245@localhost.redhat.com>; from ezannoni@redhat.com on Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 12:14:59PM -0400 X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00780.txt.bz2 > Yes, OK. Thank you, committed in the main branch. > > 2002-04-16 J. Brobecker > > > > * symfile.h (get_section_index): Define. > > * symfile.c (get_section_index): New function. > > * mdebugread.c (SC_IS_SBSS): New macro. > > (SC_IS_BSS): Return true for the scBss storage class only, as > > the scSBss storage class refers to the .sbss section. > > (parse_partial_symbols): Discard the symbols which associated > > section does not exist. > > Make sure to use the .sbss section index for symbols which > > storage class is scBss, rather than using the .bss section index. -- Joel