From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12710 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2002 00:14:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12703 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2002 00:14:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pizda.ninka.net) (216.101.162.242) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2002 00:14:58 -0000 Received: from localhost (IDENT:davem@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA01735; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 17:06:00 -0700 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 17:14:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20020421.170600.20517516.davem@redhat.com> To: ac131313@cygnus.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jingham@apple.com Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa:breakpoint] Use a ``frame_id'' to track frames From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <3CC34B88.6090809@cygnus.com> References: <3CC34B88.6090809@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00751.txt.bz2 From: Andrew Cagney Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 19:30:16 -0400 Can anyone come up with a testcase that demonstrates the need for the PC comparison test? There are various forms of trampolines (such as calling via PLT) that would require such a check, but those need to be handled by the target in other ways (e.g. with SOLIB_SKIP_TRAMPOLINE and friends).