From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16483 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2002 04:24:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16476 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2002 04:24:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dr-evil.shagadelic.org) (208.176.2.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Apr 2002 04:24:26 -0000 Received: by dr-evil.shagadelic.org (Postfix, from userid 7518) id E3A5A9869; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 21:24:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 21:24:00 -0000 From: Jason R Thorpe To: "David S. Miller" Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Sparc/Linux fixes part 1 Message-ID: <20020420212425.E1627@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> Reply-To: thorpej@wasabisystems.com Mail-Followup-To: Jason R Thorpe , "David S. Miller" , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020419.194417.101826241.davem@redhat.com> <20020420.185217.124826922.davem@redhat.com> <3CC22CA4.9060300@cygnus.com> <20020420.200957.17345631.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020420.200957.17345631.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:09:57PM -0700 Organization: Wasabi Systems, Inc. X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00712.txt.bz2 On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:09:57PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > I produced a backlog of 12 patches, then Jason Thorpe posted his > patch. You choose to review his change before any of the rest of > mine. Err, I don't think you're being completely fair to Andrew, here. The patch I posted to frame.c today was quite trivial, and the code it fixed was pretty obviously broken, and thus the patch very easy to review. The patches you've posted to the sparc target are not hugely complicated, but have to be viewed in a wider context, and discussion about one of them resulted in a do-over. It's not like all of my patches get reviewed lightning-quick either... I've been waiting for 8 days or so for approval of a patch that simply moves code from one i386 support file to another :-) -- -- Jason R. Thorpe