From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9587 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2002 01:54:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9563 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2002 01:54:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dr-evil.shagadelic.org) (208.176.2.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Apr 2002 01:54:56 -0000 Received: by dr-evil.shagadelic.org (Postfix, from userid 7518) id 4EF9F9869; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 18:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 18:54:00 -0000 From: Jason R Thorpe To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Fix busted logic in find_saved_register() Message-ID: <20020420185456.Z1627@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> Reply-To: thorpej@wasabisystems.com Mail-Followup-To: Jason R Thorpe , Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020420144817.W1627@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <3CC1F4D3.9020104@cygnus.com> <20020420162639.X1627@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <3CC20106.1080508@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3CC20106.1080508@cygnus.com>; from ac131313@cygnus.com on Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:00:06PM -0400 Organization: Wasabi Systems, Inc. X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00698.txt.bz2 On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:00:06PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > Directly. The alpha_get_saved_register() is nearly identical to the > > mips_get_saved_register(). > > If you've implemented INIT_SAVED_REGS() do you need a custom > get_saved_register()? Ok, this is where my understanding of the call_dummy stuff starts to get muddled :-) The Alpha target doesn't use the generic call_dummy frame stuff, but rather its own. I suspect it could be converted to use the generic stuff, but an explanation of how it's supposed to work would really help :-) Would it be terribly evil to commit the alpha multi-arch stuff that I have now (which would meet your condition for committing my alpha-netbsd configuration :-), and then take a stab at converting it to generic dummy frames? -- -- Jason R. Thorpe