From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4291 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2002 05:30:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4284 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2002 05:30:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pizda.ninka.net) (216.101.162.242) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Apr 2002 05:30:35 -0000 Received: from localhost (IDENT:davem@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA20046; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:21:45 -0700 Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:30:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20020420.222144.01128393.davem@redhat.com> To: ac131313@cygnus.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfc] frame->register_unwind() - different way of unwinding a frame From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <3CC24738.9060104@cygnus.com> References: <3CC24738.9060104@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00717.txt.bz2 From: Andrew Cagney Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:59:36 -0400 Doesn't show any regressions for the rs6000. I'll have to try it on a few other targets. No regressions on sparc-*-linux-gnu. The changes look fine to me.