From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9291 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2002 19:57:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9255 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2002 19:57:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nuts.ninka.net) (216.101.162.246) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Apr 2002 19:57:50 -0000 Received: (from davem@localhost) by nuts.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA09313; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:55:17 -0700 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:57:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200204171955.MAA09313@nuts.ninka.net> From: "David S. Miller" To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: [PATCH] Fix xfail Sparc pattern X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00565.txt.bz2 The xfail here applies to all Sparc platforms, not just sparc-*. 2002-04-17 David S. Miller * gdb.base/watchpoint.exp: Fix sparc xfail to be sparc*-*-* --- ./testsuite/gdb.base/watchpoint.exp.~1~ Tue Apr 16 10:56:47 2002 +++ ./testsuite/gdb.base/watchpoint.exp Tue Apr 16 10:58:53 2002 @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ proc test_stepping {} { # The following architectures define CALL_DUMMY_BREAKPOINT_OFFSET. clear_xfail "alpha-*-*" clear_xfail "mips*-*-*" - clear_xfail "sparc-*-*" + clear_xfail "sparc*-*-*" clear_xfail "hppa*-*-*bsd*" # It works with the generic inferior function calling code too. clear_xfail "mn10200*-*-*"