From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-14273-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 9390 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2002 22:06:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 9362 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2002 22:06:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Apr 2002 22:06:25 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3DM6NE30493;
	Sat, 13 Apr 2002 17:06:23 -0500
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 15:06:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200204132206.g3DM6NE30493@duracef.shout.net>
To: ac131313@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [patch] gdb.c++/local.exp: add pr numbers
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00494.txt.bz2

Andrew Cagney writes:
> Suggest just ``(gdb/482)''.  It appears GCC really is switching to 
> Bugzilla so ``gnats'' may one day not apply.

I thought about that.  When we switch to Bugzilla, is the bug still
going to be #482?  I like "gnats:gdb/482" because it identifies the bug
reporting system that actually contains the bug.

I don't know if there's a standard way of citing bug reports ...
do you want to promulgate one?

Michael C