From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31550 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2002 15:22:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31514 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2002 15:22:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO darkstar.welcomehome.org) (192.203.188.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2002 15:22:55 -0000 Received: (from rob@localhost) by darkstar.welcomehome.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id g38FVP705442; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 09:31:25 -0600 Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 08:22:00 -0000 From: Rob Savoye To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Fernando Nasser , Michael Elizabeth Chastain , ac131313@cygnus.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: KFAIL DejaGnu patch Message-ID: <20020408093125.B3523@welcomehome.org> References: <20020407173534.B16561@welcomehome.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:58:52AM +0300 X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:58:52AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Are there any reason not to continue maintaining the document in > Texinfo? Especially since the latest makeinfo supports DocBook (as well > as HTML and XML)? The main reason is that texinfo formatted version is way out of date, because I stopped maintaining it when I converted the whole thing by hand to SGML/DocBook several years ago. I guess the main problem is that DocBook doesn't spit out an info page, which would be kindof nice... But there has been alot added to the sgml formatted version that would all have to be merged back into the texinfo document. btw - Matt says he'll add the extra fields for ERROR and WARNING to the XML output, which he's hoping will be done as soon as he firms up the DTD. Anything else you need to have that be useful ? - rob -