From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-14053-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27479 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2002 23:30:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 27472 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2002 23:30:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO darkstar.welcomehome.org) (192.203.188.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2002 23:30:23 -0000
Received: (from rob@localhost)
	by darkstar.welcomehome.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id g37NcD418247;
	Sun, 7 Apr 2002 17:38:13 -0600
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 16:30:00 -0000
From: Rob Savoye <rob@welcomehome.org>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Cc: fnasser@redhat.com, ac131313@cygnus.com, drow@mvista.com,
   gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: KFAILs [Was: [RFA/mi-testsuite] XFAIL mi*-console.exp]
Message-ID: <20020407173813.C16561@welcomehome.org>
References: <200204051909.g35J99P32716@duracef.shout.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <200204051909.g35J99P32716@duracef.shout.net>; from Michael Elizabeth Chastain on Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 01:09:09PM -0600
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00274.txt.bz2

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 01:09:09PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> Actually I prefer the pair "kpass/kfail" to "xpass/kfail" and "xpass/xfail"!
> "xpass/kfail" looks weird and lets in some ambiguity.  Can you implement it
> as "kpass/kfail"?

  I prefer kpass/kfail too.

	- rob -