From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-14028-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 7063 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2002 16:10:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 7020 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2002 16:10:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2002 16:10:19 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g37G9Af13709;
	Sun, 7 Apr 2002 11:09:10 -0500
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 09:10:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200204071609.g37G9Af13709@duracef.shout.net>
To: fnasser@redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: KFAIL DejaGnu patch
Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
   rob@welcomehome.org
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00249.txt.bz2

Okay, I checked two gdb.log files chosen at random, and did
before-and-after diffs.  The only differences are the usual differences
in process id's and addresses and times and stuff (3000 lines per file!)

I'll proofread the code and documents tonight.

Michael C