From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10870 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2002 19:31:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10863 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2002 19:31:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2002 19:31:06 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16tvsa-0007TJ-00; Sat, 06 Apr 2002 14:29:40 -0500 Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 11:31:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Further gdbserver cleanups Message-ID: <20020406142940.B28492@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020406133335.A26201@nevyn.them.org> <3CAF4B16.7040708@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CAF4B16.7040708@cygnus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00230.txt.bz2 On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 02:23:02PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >This patch adds -Wall to gdbserver's build options, cleans up everything > >that it turned up, and adds the beginnings of a target stack. It also adds > >a simplistic mechanism to track child processes opaquely; for instance, for > >per-child regcaches. No real new functionality here, but it should be > >pretty obvious where I'm going. The next batch of changes are likely to be > >more interesting. > > Er, there are still two commits in there. I was going to do it as two commits, but separating it out again seemed pointless. I'll do it if you prefer; it's just a little work playing with my changelogs. > Rather than ``-Wall'' just ,-Werror as with the rest of GDB. See: > http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/onlinedocs/gdbint_13.html#SEC104 I haven't added the configury for ,-Werror yet. I'll do that soon. The way that gdbserver is implemented (and for most of the what I see changing in the near future) it does not have the motivation that GDB has to avoid -Wunused-parameter; so I went with -Wall by default, which is stronger. If you'd prefer that I be consistent with the rest of GDB I've no objection. > (Oh, also, at present ARI skips that directory.) As it should, I think. Things have different names in gdbserver land; ARI would have to be trimmed a bit for it, probably. > >I'll check this in in a day or two if no one objects (well, and when Andrew > >thinks it's been long enough and checks in the relevant MAINTAINERS patch). > > Oops. I'd better drain last weeks patch postings ... > > Andrew > > -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer