From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9925 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2002 19:23:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9917 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2002 19:23:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2002 19:23:26 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16tvmk-0007QT-00 for ; Sat, 06 Apr 2002 14:23:38 -0500 Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 11:23:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Zap old style standard register $fp, fix gdb/251 Message-ID: <20020406142338.A28492@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3CAF49D6.9020904@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CAF49D6.9020904@cygnus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00229.txt.bz2 On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 02:17:42PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Hello, > > Following on from my previous patch, this zaps the old way of handling > $fp ($pc, ...). This in turn removes any confusion between $fp (the > register) and $fp (the frame->base). > > There is still more work though, targets are still required to define > FP_REGNUM when they don't even have an FP register (see MIPS). That is > next. > > Comments? I love it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer