From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6700 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2002 01:57:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6693 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2002 01:57:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2002 01:57:09 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g361v5t09705; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 19:57:05 -0600 Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 17:57:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200204060157.g361v5t09705@duracef.shout.net> To: ac131313@cygnus.com, fnasser@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: KFAIL DejaGnu patch Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, rob@welcomehome.org X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2 ac> To be honest, I think just removing all but the most recent (i.e. in ac> last two years) xfails might be for the best. I'm okay with that. I just changed my report generator so that everything except PASS is an attention line. So starting with the next report, the attention reports are going to include KPASS, KFAIL, XPASS, XFAIL. That increases the attention table for gdb HEAD from 86 lines to 271 lines. I think that is manageable. The difference tables have always been agnostic to the type of result, and those are what I use most of the time. Michael C