From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28799 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2002 00:51:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28790 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2002 00:51:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2002 00:51:56 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g360pl505305; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 18:51:47 -0600 Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 16:51:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200204060051.g360pl505305@duracef.shout.net> To: fnasser@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: KFAIL DejaGnu patch Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, rob@welcomehome.org X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00202.txt.bz2 Fernando Nasser writes: > Michael Chastain: Will you be willing to help me test this? > I've tried it and it seems to work. Yours scripts must also > be happy with it. You got it. I use dejagnu 1.4.2, so I'll be working from that base. I'm willing to switch to sourceware dejagnu but I'd rather stay close to the fsf dejagnu if I can. > I was trying to find some test to try the setup_kfail on. Try PR gdb/460. It mentions one failure in the bug report. You can download my testsuite directory tarballs off the bug report and diff the gdb.log files to pick up the regressions in gdb.base/condbreak.exp and gdb.base/ena-dis-br.exp. I have 2.0 gigabytes of test directories now. I'm still experimenting how to communicate stuff so that people can understand it. The testsuite directory tarballs are just another experiment, let me know how it works. It's kinda depressing that the test suite and the bug database are so disjoint. I guess we're here to fix that. Michael C