From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-13962-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 28594 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2002 21:34:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 28581 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2002 21:34:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2002 21:34:48 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g35LYiF18389;
	Fri, 5 Apr 2002 15:34:44 -0600
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 13:34:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200204052134.g35LYiF18389@duracef.shout.net>
To: ezannoni@redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] import drow dbxread.c fix to branch
Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00183.txt.bz2

Jim Blandy writes:
> Perhaps this is bad attitude on my part, but I think we should go
> ahead with the changes (which we know are helpful), and wait until the
> older problem surfaces.

Sounds good to me.

DanielJ's patches have all been in areas unrelated to FredF's original
patch.  What's more, they are fixing more than FredF's patch broke.
So I'm happy with the path we are on.  I just want to nail all the
regressions in the 5.2 branch before it ships.

Michael C