From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4332 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2002 01:10:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4325 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2002 01:10:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2002 01:10:19 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16teir-0001oa-00; Fri, 05 Apr 2002 20:10:29 -0500 Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 17:10:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Cc: fnasser@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: KFAIL DejaGnu patch Message-ID: <20020405201029.A6868@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, fnasser@redhat.com References: <200204051753.g35HrUn23328@duracef.shout.net> <3CAE4182.BED29D4D@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CAE4182.BED29D4D@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00204.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 07:29:54PM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote: > Well, I am attaching the DejaGnu changes for KFAILs. > > Rob: can you please take a look, specially in the documentation > changes and see if they are fit for the master repository? > > Michael Chastain: Will you be willing to help me test this? > I've tried it and it seems to work. Yours scripts must also > be happy with it. > > Best regards, > Fernnado > > > P.S.: I was trying to find some test to try the setup_kfail on. I went > looking for the setup_xfail *-*-* calls but most don't have any comment > why they are marked like that. Then I've tried looking for the FAILs > and see if I could find a bug entry for those -- but it is not a > trivial task. I guess we will need everybody's help and memories to > gradually have things properly documented and related to the bug > entries. Looks good to me. Fernando, could I persuade you to write up a GDB-specific list of what each of the DejaGNU result codes is meant to cover? We could stick it in testsuite/ somewhere. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer