From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30871 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2002 19:14:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30864 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2002 19:14:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2002 19:14:35 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g35JEW700797; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 13:14:32 -0600 Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 11:14:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200204051914.g35JEW700797@duracef.shout.net> To: drow@mvista.com Subject: Re: RFC: KFAILs [Was: [RFA/mi-testsuite] XFAIL mi*-console.exp] Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, fnasser@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, rob@welcomehome.org X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > Don't use gnatsweb for this sort of thing at all. If you look in the > this. /usr/bin/edit-pr and /usr/bin/query-pr, in particular. Thanks. I don't even know if the underlying database is web-accessible for query-pr, though. And I don't want to do research right now, because this isn't on the 5.2 path. > Don't get too hooked on these though. I'd much rather see us move to > Bugzilla, since it should be available on sources.redhat.com in a > couple of weeks. I figure I will have to have a modular "take this bug id and dereference it" function anyways. My weekly reports already have clickable bug links in them, but I won't have to make them by hand. On the other hand, several people will have to crawl through the existing attention lines and create bug reports for lots of things. Michael C