From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3517 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2002 05:36:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3508 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2002 05:36:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2002 05:36:07 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g345a6t30923; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 23:36:06 -0600 Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 21:36:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200204040536.g345a6t30923@duracef.shout.net> To: drow@mvista.com Subject: Re: [RFA] import drow dbxread.c fix to branch Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00102.txt.bz2 DanielJ writes: > Only shows on GCC 3.1, eh? I'll try to look at it later, but I have no > post-3.0 toolchain installed right now. Actually, I should > investigate, to make sure it isn't a 3.1 regression... On the next spin, I'll make a special report of regressions for gcc 3.0.4 versus gcc-3_1-branch. You can already look at "difference by gcc" in the regular report if you want to pick up a hot spot or two. BTW my test harness now saves the whole test directory, including all the executable files. In fact I'll just throw some tarball up in my ftp directory in case it might help someone: ftp://ftp.shout.net/pub/users/mec/gdb/for-pr-gdb-381.tar.gz ftp://ftp.shout.net/pub/users/mec/gdb/for-pr-gdb-381-src.tar.gz Michael C