From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8827 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2002 06:18:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8758 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2002 06:18:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2002 06:18:50 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g336In527476; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 00:18:49 -0600 Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 22:18:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200204030618.g336In527476@duracef.shout.net> To: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix watchpoints when stepping over a breakpoint X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 My test bed says: no significant changes. target = native host = i686-pc-linux-gnu%rh-7.2 gdb = HEAD%20020331 + drow infrun.c gcc = 2.95.3, vendor, 3.0.4, gcc-3_1-branch%20020331, HEAD%20020331 glibc = vendor goption = -gdwarf-2, -gstabs+ I'm not qualified to give an opinion on infrun.c changes, but I can say that this one don't break anything on native i686-pc-linux-gnu. I also note that there is an insignificant change in this test: gdb.c++/annota2.exp: annotate-quit This test is unstable and changes a lot, even on identical back-to-back runs. Auspiciously all of the noise on this comparison was FAIL->PASS noise but it's probably meaningless. Michael C