Re: gdb-patches Digest 3 Apr 2002 00:52:01 -0000 Issue 1049

David Anderson
2002-04-03T01:18:13Z

>I didn't know that the existing libdwarf had been LGPL'd; the copy on
>SGI's site certainly hasn't been, but that's a bit old. However, it's
>exceedingly unlikely we could get the copyright assigned to the FSF.

Hm. Which site "hasn't been"?

Yes, SGI's libdwarf is LGPL, but
I agree it is unlikely FSF could get the copyright.

davea@sgi.com