From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26717 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2002 01:18:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26697 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2002 01:18:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rj.sgi.com) (204.94.215.100) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2002 01:18:11 -0000 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by rj.sgi.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/linux-outbound_gateway-1.2) with ESMTP id g331IA6G023718; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 17:18:11 -0800 Received: from quasar.engr.sgi.com (quasar.engr.sgi.com [130.62.180.91]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA94014; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 17:18:10 -0800 (PST) Received: (from davea@localhost) by quasar.engr.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA46721; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 17:17:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 17:18:00 -0000 From: David Anderson Message-Id: <200204030117.RAA46721@quasar.engr.sgi.com> To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches-digest-help@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb-patches Digest 3 Apr 2002 00:52:01 -0000 Issue 1049 X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2 >I didn't know that the existing libdwarf had been LGPL'd; the copy on >SGI's site certainly hasn't been, but that's a bit old. However, it's >exceedingly unlikely we could get the copyright assigned to the FSF. Hm. Which site "hasn't been"? Yes, SGI's libdwarf is LGPL, but I agree it is unlikely FSF could get the copyright. davea@sgi.com