From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-13825-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 14860 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2002 00:42:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 14851 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2002 00:42:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2002 00:42:49 -0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 16sYrU-0005Ru-00; Tue, 02 Apr 2002 19:42:52 -0500
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 16:42:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Cc: Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFA/mi-testsuite] XFAIL mi*-console.exp
Message-ID: <20020402194252.A20826@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
	Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2

These tests are testing for a feature that exists either nowhere or just in
simulators and some remote stubs: that the inferior's output goes through
GDB and is properly encoded by the MI layer.  Since support isn't there for
many remote debugging stubs or for native, I think these two tests should be
XFAIL'd.  Does that make sense, Andrew?  If so, OK to commit this?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

2002-04-02  Daniel Jacobowitz  <drow@mvista.com>

	* gdb.mi/mi-console.exp: Accept lack of MI-console output as an
	XFAIL.
	* gdb.mi/mi0-console.exp: Likewise.

Index: testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-console.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-console.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 mi-console.exp
--- mi-console.exp	2001/08/19 01:23:43	1.7
+++ mi-console.exp	2002/04/03 00:38:09
@@ -92,7 +92,10 @@ gdb_expect {
 	# multiple event sources to channel the output back through the
 	# MI.
 
-	fail "Hello message (known bug)"
+	xfail "Hello message (known limitation)"
+    }
+    -notransfer -re "\r\n$mi_gdb_prompt" {
+	xfail "Hello message (no output)"
     }
     timeout {
 	fail "Hello message (timeout)"
Index: testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-console.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-console.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.5 mi0-console.exp
--- mi0-console.exp	2001/08/19 01:23:43	1.5
+++ mi0-console.exp	2002/04/03 00:38:09
@@ -92,7 +92,10 @@ gdb_expect {
 	# multiple event sources to channel the output back through the
 	# MI.
 
-	fail "Hello message (known bug)"
+	xfail "Hello message (known limitation)"
+    }
+    -notransfer -re "\r\n$mi_gdb_prompt" {
+	xfail "Hello message (no output)"
     }
     timeout {
 	fail "Hello message (timeout)"