From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 736 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2002 21:15:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 723 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2002 21:15:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Apr 2002 21:15:42 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16sVd1-0000DU-00; Tue, 02 Apr 2002 16:15:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 13:15:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Daniel Berlin Cc: Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let dwarf2 CFI's execute_stack_op be used outside of CFI Message-ID: <20020402161543.A816@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Berlin , Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020402145750.A8031@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 04:12:26PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:46:39PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > However, it's > > > > exceedingly unlikely we could get the copyright assigned to the FSF. > > > So? > > > > So it would be a royal pain in the ass to distribute with GDB and > > include as part of GDB. The FSF "doesn't like it when we do that". > > That's existing policy, like it or not. > > Well, let's ask dave anderson if he's willing to assign copyright, since > AFAIK, he's the sole author of libdwarf. > --Dan Well, he'd probably have to do hoops through SGI; but still, it's definitely worth asking! -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer