From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31290 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2002 19:57:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31282 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2002 19:57:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Apr 2002 19:57:48 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16sUPe-000270-00; Tue, 02 Apr 2002 14:57:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 11:57:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Daniel Berlin Cc: Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let dwarf2 CFI's execute_stack_op be used outside of CFI Message-ID: <20020402145750.A8031@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Berlin , Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020402143148.A26046@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:46:39PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > However, it's > > exceedingly unlikely we could get the copyright assigned to the FSF. > So? So it would be a royal pain in the ass to distribute with GDB and include as part of GDB. The FSF "doesn't like it when we do that". That's existing policy, like it or not. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer