Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: preprocessor macro support (should actually work now)
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:27:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020329212714.GA8915@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <npadsrnkea.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>

Jim Blandy wrote:-

> For spectators: libcpp represents the stream of source code it's
> expanding as an array of token structures, not a simple array of
> characters.  When it sees some macro named X expand to a sequence that
> includes the identifier token X, it sets a flag on that token
> indicating that it should never be expanded as a macro invocation.  As
> the example shows, this flag may need to remain set long after the
> original invocation of the macro named X has been processed.  I don't
> see any easy way to get this effect with a string-based expander, like
> the one in my patch.

Yah, it's a mess.  Have you looked at the venerable "cccp" that was the
expander for 2.95.x and earlier?  It's a right kludge; but it works in
most cases (still a few bugs, and segfaults).  It "surrounds" such
tokens with "\r" in its buffer, to indicate the token should not be
expanded.

It worked, but it was a little tasteless IMO 8^)

> I didn't really understand all the logistics that got brought up
> regarding moving libcpp into its own directory in the repository, to
> make it easier to share with gdb.  But the sooner that happens, the
> sooner we can replace my macro expander with one that works better.

Best left to Zack.  I don't think I'm qualified 8-)

Neil.


      reply	other threads:[~2002-03-29 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-27 23:05 Jim Blandy
2002-03-28  0:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-03-29  2:01 ` Neil Booth
2002-03-29 13:17   ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-29 13:27     ` Neil Booth [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020329212714.GA8915@daikokuya.demon.co.uk \
    --to=neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jimb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox