From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16290 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2002 21:21:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16278 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2002 21:21:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Mar 2002 21:21:29 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2TLLOZ24987; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 15:21:24 -0600 Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:21:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200203292121.g2TLLOZ24987@duracef.shout.net> To: drow@mvista.com, jimb@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/stabs] Fix for line table problems (was: Re: [RFC] Gdb line table implementation tweak) Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00609.txt.bz2 I'll do my weekly pull this evening (2002-03-29) and post the analysis and tables tomorrow afternoon. If the "step" fixes are in the branch then I will post a detailed 5.1.1 versus 5.2 branch analysis on Sunday. I've been busy at my day job so I haven't kept up with the gdb mailing lists lately. Michael C