From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31669 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2002 18:35:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31641 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2002 18:35:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2002 18:35:09 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16pvmo-0007A7-00 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 13:35:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 10:35:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] x86-64 segment registers handling Message-ID: <20020326133510.A27305@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3CA0AF53.8030609@suse.cz> <20020326131355.A25917@nevyn.them.org> <3CA0BD78.4070608@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CA0BD78.4070608@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00502.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:27:04PM +0100, Michal Ludvig wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >Can you update gdbserver/linux-x86-64-low.c with these changes, please? > > > >Also, it appears that you changed the layout of GDB's register cache > >for x86-64. At this time that means you also changed the remote > >protocol. regformats/reg-x86-64.dat also needs to be updated. > > Patch appended. Are these changes enough? Can I commit? Thanks. Andrew approved the rest of it, and this bit is "obvious", so go ahead (with ChangeLog entry for this part). -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer