From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25457 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2002 04:12:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25450 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2002 04:12:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fred.ninemoons.com) (68.15.182.197) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2002 04:12:07 -0000 Received: (from fnf@localhost) by fred.ninemoons.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2Q4CAw12281; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 21:12:10 -0700 From: Fred Fish Message-Id: <200203260412.g2Q4CAw12281@fred.ninemoons.com> Subject: Re: Your patch to list.exp To: drow@mvista.com (Daniel Jacobowitz) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 20:12:00 -0000 Cc: fnf@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: fnf@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20020325201108.A28503@nevyn.them.org> from "Daniel Jacobowitz" at Mar 25, 2002 08:11:08 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00483.txt.bz2 > I just saw this on gdb-cvs. Was it ever on gdb-patches? I don't recall > seeing it at least. Yes, here is the URL to the original post: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-01/msg00115.html There was also a reply from Kevin Buettner which I got in email but which doesn't appear to be in the gdb-patches list: I just came across this myself. I agree with Michael and Fred that the isnative test is bogus. Kevin > Is it actually correct if you have debugging information for _start > available? If we connect and are in a known line, presumably we will list > there instead. Hmm, don't know. I do know that I originally found this problem with an actual remote target for which the patch is OK. -Fred