From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30796 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2002 04:30:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30789 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2002 04:30:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2002 04:30:08 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16pibA-0000up-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 23:30:16 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 20:30:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: fnf@redhat.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Your patch to list.exp Message-ID: <20020325233016.A2984@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: fnf@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020325201108.A28503@nevyn.them.org> <200203260412.g2Q4CAw12281@fred.ninemoons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200203260412.g2Q4CAw12281@fred.ninemoons.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00484.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:12:10PM -0700, Fred Fish wrote: > > I just saw this on gdb-cvs. Was it ever on gdb-patches? I don't recall > > seeing it at least. > > Yes, here is the URL to the original post: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-01/msg00115.html > > There was also a reply from Kevin Buettner which > I got in email but which doesn't appear to be in the gdb-patches > list: > > I just came across this myself. I agree with Michael and Fred that the > isnative test is bogus. > > Kevin Oh yes, I remember now. Thanks. > > Is it actually correct if you have debugging information for _start > > available? If we connect and are in a known line, presumably we will list > > there instead. > > Hmm, don't know. I do know that I originally found this problem with > an actual remote target for which the patch is OK. I just verified that the test fails if you have debugging info for _start. In light of that, please consider reverting this (and maybe an informative comment...). -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer