From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-13469-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 18800 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2002 20:05:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 18631 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2002 20:05:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO monkey.daikokuya.demon.co.uk) (158.152.184.26)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2002 20:05:35 -0000
Received: from neil by monkey.daikokuya.demon.co.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 16n3NE-0005jN-00; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 20:04:52 +0000
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 12:05:00 -0000
From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
To: Stan Shebs <shebs@apple.com>
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dan@dberlin.org>, Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: RFC: C/C++ preprocessor macro support for GDB
Message-ID: <20020318200448.GA22023@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
References: <20020318072916.GB14970@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203180253320.21768-100000@dberlin.org> <20020318184525.GC19897@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <3C9643B8.334D7812@apple.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C9643B8.334D7812@apple.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00321.txt.bz2

Hi Stan!

Stan Shebs wrote:-

> As someone who has had much of his time consumed by keeping
> another preprocessor (Apple's cpp-precomp) in sync with GNU cpp,
> I think we really should try hard to avoid duplicate macro
> expanders.

What were the issues?  Subtle differences in macro expansion?  I'm
curious.

Neil.