From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7333 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2002 17:37:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7133 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2002 17:37:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO houston.candd.org) (216.112.178.26) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2002 17:37:20 -0000 Received: from houston.candd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by houston.candd.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA11028; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 12:37:09 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200203131737.MAA11028@houston.candd.org> To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFA/RFC] Don't use lwp_from_thread() in thread_db_wait() In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 12 Mar 2002 11:23:31 EST." <20020312112331.A24963@nevyn.them.org> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:37:00 -0000 From: David Taylor X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00194.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 11:23:31 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Yes, that could probably be arranged. Someday we should talk to a > vendor of an M:N threads package and see what we have to work with. I > don't know of any offhand besides NGPT. If I understand you correctly, then: Solaris.