From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-13327-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26674 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2002 10:49:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26573 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2002 10:48:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2002 10:48:57 -0000
Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1345)
	id 1D75BF28C9; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 05:48:57 -0500 (EST)
From: Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr@gnat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Confusion regarding gdb_5_1_1-2002-01-24-release tag
Message-Id: <20020312104857.1D75BF28C9@nile.gnat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 02:49:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2


No doubt this question simply reflects my aversion to CVS, but here goes:
a cvs log run on gdb/value.h shows that tag gdb_5_1_1-2002-01-24-release
is defined as 1.21.  Revision 1.21 of gdb/value.h is dated 2001/05/21.  
Revision 1.26 is dated 2002/01/04.  This appears not to be the only
example.  What gives?

Thanks.

Paul