Re: [RFA] include/gdb/signals.h

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 05:26:51PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> >>There should also be an entry for src/include/ChangeLog indicating the 
> >>presence of the new directory.
> >
> >
> >Good thought.  Since DJ said it wouldn't cause a problem, shall I
> >commit this?
> 
> Commit to src, yep.
> 
> I'm trying to figure out if DJ's reply:
> 
> >I'm just wondering how DJ would react to the addition of an entry in 
> >>gcc/include/ChangeLog there isn't a corresponding directory (gcc/include 
> >>is the master yet really it isn't :-)
> >
> >
> >Not a problem.  The scripts ignore anything in src that isn't also in
> >gcc, and this wouldn't be the first ignored subdirectory.
> 
> is an ok to also commit the ChangeLog entry to the GCC include 
> directory.  I guess it is a doesn't matter.  Come the revolution 
> (GCC+GDB merge) I'd like to try to avoid a merge that looses src/include 
> related ChangeLog entries.

Committed.  DJ tells me that the scripts which sync the two include
directories will properly ignore ChangeLog entries (neat!) for things
which are not in both repositories.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer