From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14241 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2002 22:30:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14159 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2002 22:30:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Mar 2002 22:30:44 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16kBq2-0002do-00 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 17:30:46 -0500 Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 14:30:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] remote debugging patches Message-ID: <20020310173046.C9299@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3C8BA71F.20807@suse.cz> <20020310143517.B3933@nevyn.them.org> <3C8BB74D.90705@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C8BB74D.90705@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00151.txt.bz2 On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 08:43:09PM +0100, Michal Ludvig wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >Except that this introduces a second use of the NSS functions, while I > >keep meaning to remove the first (fairly recent) one. Please don't do > >that; I want to keep gdbserver independent of the sick and disgusting > >dynamic loading mess that is name lookup under glibc. > > OK, so what about just printing out the IP address? Or make it a > compile-time option wrapped by #ifdef .. #endif (with default off)? I'd prefer just IP address. > And what about the first patch to remote.c? Neither is up to me, but I've no objection. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer