From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23391 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2002 06:02:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23355 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2002 06:02:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Mar 2002 06:02:10 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2A622l00964; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 00:02:02 -0600 Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 22:02:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200203100602.g2A622l00964@duracef.shout.net> To: ac131313@cygnus.com, drow@mvista.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mi-var-cmd.exp, mi0-var-cmd.exp: accommodate gcc v3 Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00133.txt.bz2 I'm allergic to removing information from ChangeLogs, but I feel comfortable adding a duplicate entry to gdb.mi/ChangeLog. I don't think a future historian would get too confused by that. So that's what I'll do. And in the future, I'll remember that gdb.mi/ChangeLog exists, and use it (it looks like it's still active). If only that were the worst problem gdb had. Michael C