From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 463 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2002 17:04:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 399 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2002 17:03:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Mar 2002 17:03:57 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g29H3uP04705; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 11:03:56 -0600 Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 09:04:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200203091703.g29H3uP04705@duracef.shout.net> To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mec@shout.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] mi-var-cmd.exp, mi0-var-cmd.exp: accommodate gcc v3 X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00122.txt.bz2 Commited to gdb_5_2-branch. I already committed to this to mainline. Errr, in mainline, I added to the wrong ChangeLog. I added to gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog instead of gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog. Should I fix up the ChangeLog's in mainline, or add an entry to gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog, or leave them alone? Michael C 2002-03-04 Michael Chastain * mi-var-cmd.exp: In test "create local variable func", accommodate gcc v3 function signature. * mi0-var-cmd-exp: Ditto.