From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22009 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2002 05:45:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21936 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2002 05:45:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2002 05:45:37 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g225jaq20874; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 23:45:36 -0600 Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 21:45:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200203020545.g225jaq20874@duracef.shout.net> To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: properly skip interrupts.exp X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 I have doubts about this. It seems plausible to me that "nointerrupts" is a property of the host, not the target. gdb.base/interrupt.exp seems very host oriented to me. But dejagnu 1.4.2 has just two boards that set this: baseboards.exp/dos.exp baseboards.exp/m68hc11-sim.exp I don't really know whether host or target is correct, and I don't know what will happen with a switch. Sigh. I'm inclined to rip out "nointerrupts", rip out the years of "setup_xfail" crud, and let the FAILs fall where they may. But not with the 5.2 branch and 5.2 release imminent. Michael C