From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-13112-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 519 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2002 00:45:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 375 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2002 00:45:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2002 00:45:10 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1S0j6E19785;
	Wed, 27 Feb 2002 18:45:06 -0600
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 16:45:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200202280045.g1S0j6E19785@duracef.shout.net>
To: fnf@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Gdb line table implementation tweak
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00727.txt.bz2

I'm getting similar failures on:

  [target=native host=i686-pc-linux-gnu%rh-7.2 gdb=HEAD%2002-02-26
   gcc=2.95.3 glibc=vendor goption=-g-stabs+]

I put up a gdb.log and gdb.sum file on:

  ftp://ftp.shout.net/pub/users/mec/step-bug/gdb.sum
  ftp://ftp.shout.net/pub/users/mec/step-bug/gdb.log

A good example of the bad behavior is:

  gdb.base/step-test: large struct by value

gdb tries to step into a function but instead it steps somewhere else.

For me, the bug is specific to gcc 2.95.3 and stabs debugging format.

Michael C