Re: [RFA] PTRACE_*REGS and x86-64-linux support for gdbserver

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 01:49:58AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Yes, ok.

Thanks, committed.

> I noticed, in an earlier patch you create a new ``..._linux'' .dat file. 
>  That addresses the only concern I had - were some of these register 
> format files GNU/Linux specific.  If they were, you were renaming them.

They weren't; at the time I made them, we had the glorious state of
affairs where none of the Linux targets had unique register mappings. 
At least, I still believe that.  orig_eax came along later and put the
lie to that...  I still feel like there should be a better solution;
but that will require some thinking about the remote protocol, and can
wait.

The new register file conveniently snuck in just under the 8.3 ARI
limit, too :)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer