From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18192 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2002 21:52:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18095 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2002 21:52:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Feb 2002 21:52:29 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1NLqQj24526; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 15:52:26 -0600 Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:52:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200202232152.g1NLqQj24526@duracef.shout.net> To: jimb@redhat.com, kettenis@kettenis.dyndns.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Gdb line table implementation tweak Cc: fnf@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00649.txt.bz2 I'm seeing the same bugs on: [target=native host=i686-pc-linux-gnu%rh-7.2 gdb=HEAD%20020222 gcc=2.95.3 glibc=vendor goption=-gstabs+] It looks like two bugs, or maybe two manifestations of the same underlying bug. One manifestation is that the "step" command does not step into the function being called. The other manifestation is a lot of messages such as "No line number known for main." It did not happen with gdb=HEAD%20020216 in the same configuration so it's a recent regression. Also, gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2 works fine, as do all the gcc v3 compilers (with both dwarf-2 and stabs). I am filing PR's in a few hours with log excerpts and stuff. Michael C