From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20684 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2002 07:16:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20495 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2002 07:16:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Feb 2002 07:16:03 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1M7G0t22633; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 01:16:00 -0600 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 23:16:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200202220716.g1M7G0t22633@duracef.shout.net> To: drow@mvista.com Subject: Re: RFA: parse output from `info sources' one filename at a time Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00615.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz write: > I'm not arguing that expect/dejagnu version skew hasn't caused problems > in the past, but that's unrelated to this. You don't get the error > because your C library does not contain debug info; no standard > desktop/server distribution leaves it there, generally. Oh, foo! You are right, the C library is another free variable in the testing system. I wonder if I'll ever get my arms around the entire set of variables for a reproducible test run. Sad but enlightened, Michael C